Chi amministra la "cosa pubblica" ha il dovere di non danneggiarla e di non permettere che qualcun'altro lo faccia.
Chi amministra la "cosa pubblica" ha il dovere di prendersi cura degli interessi di tutti i cittadini e non solo di quello di pochi.
Chi amministra la "cosa pubblica" ha il civic duty to preserve it and can not afford the interest of a few destroy the "common good".
Who administers the "public" has a duty to prevent all actions that cause more harm than good.
Who administers the "public" has a duty to know what will be the "social costs" caused by authorizing projects.
Who administers the "public" should be a good father defending his son weaker than the most arrogant and wicked.
Who does not behave in this way is worthy to be called Chief Executive?
This work is so hard that the final choices should not be left to those who is effectively "blackmailed" by "powers" are stronger than him. The biggest mistake you can do in these cases is to be forced to choose the lesser evil, when in reality you should be able to claim the greater good for everyone.
Where and who is the arbitrro?
goes a long whistle of rigor
January 16, 2011
times, the context in which the media's shocking proposal Mall Borgarello got the green light to emphasize three major aspects of the severe crisis of political representation in act in the province of Pavia. And in many of its local institutions and its leadership party.
Compared to the time that this project is indicative of the shopping center, which for over two decades hovering over a wide area Borgarello, able to take off just as the administration of that municipality is not in the hands of representatives elected by citizens, but a commissioner appointed by the prefect. And that the consequences of the conduct of judicial inquiry note.
In four months, the polls will decide who will hold Borgarello for the next five years. But, of course, one hundred and twenty days of waiting must have seemed too long to someone. So surely the most important decision ever taken in the fate of Borgarello, and not solo di Borgarello, vista la vastità dell’area coinvolta, viene presa in una situazione di rappresentanza azzoppata. Sancisce un fatto rilevantissimo e lo fa in assenza di un sindaco, di una giunta, di un consiglio comunale. E’ vero che gli amministratori di Borgarello avevano fatto in tempo a varare il progetto. Lo avevano fatto con una fretta indiavolata, appena prima di tornare a casa. Però - e forse questo lo si capisce solo adesso - in questo modo stavano rendendo l’ultimo servizio alla proposta di centro commerciale il cui dossier è arrivato davanti al Ponzio Pilato, o ai variegati Pilati che lo dovevano autorizzare, portato da una figura «neutrale» quale quella del commissario prefettizio.
We come now to the context. The context is "Pilate." That is characterized by a power vacuum in which all wash their hands while having hands-on drafting of this choice. A further element implemented by the fact that the provincial administration, although a very different role could be in question, is close to renewal. Between one hundred and twenty days goes to the polls. Also there will be a carousel of faces old and new responsibilities that you spent dribbling and suspicious neutrality. Thus a situation where the ambiguity seems the better route. Where most experienced politicians seem to be wise and not be there. Letting others is spent on widening the gap - now or never - to a project per cent and a reason should be rejected.
And here comes the shocking media. A valuable allies in the persons of Mayors, tagged Democratic Party, and the Certosa Giussago make done by midwives to the mall Borgarello. Not a word from their devastating impact of the project on a large area of \u200b\u200bPavia and Pavia. Not a single argument which disagrees with the scenarios evoked authoritatively about the negative consequences on the quality of land development and the further collapse of roads already in serious trouble. In the name of calculations related to restricted benefits for their spatial locations the two Mayors Pd bow down to a choice that devours land and increase a spiral of increasingly precarious employment. And where the balance of employment, realistically, it will not be positive. The draft
mall - is now clear - he walked on tracks where the footprints of a deployment, and its opposite side, they mixed the steps. It seems to be able to touch the coveted goal. Despite the furious indignation of the local administrators of Pavia and San Genesio. In the face of icy lightning on the heads of the wicked that are lower on Pd Pavia mayors 'disobedient' but remain in their party. And with whom you are side by side even in joints, such as Giussago, including the provincial secretary of the Democratic Party is significant.
At this point it would welcome a clarification that loud and clear from both deployment upholds a commitment to equity and long lasting against time, context and confusing media that have given the green light to the mall Borgarello.
Maybe you can still be heard - all together - a whistle that will stop the game from the penalty spot. But not forever, at least, until, between one hundred and twenty days, the public will be invited to vote. To say, in a clear and irrevocable, as they want it the future of this province.
- George Boatti
0 comments:
Post a Comment